The Zhumadian intermediate people’s court ruled that the lower court responded absurd has sent inves-splitit


The Zhumadian intermediate people’s court ruled that the lower court responded absurd has sent investigation team investigation – Beijing Central Broadcasting Network Zhumadian on September 23rd news (reporter Guan Xin Li Fan) according to voice of China "peak Evening News" reported that recently, a party of Henan Zhumadian County used to reflect the voice of China said she was in Zhumadian city court hearing. In civil cases, although winning the lawsuit, but because before Ru’nan county court Zhumadian intermediate people’s court ruled that the willful, resulting in nearly 4 years of effective judgment cannot be executed. In recent years, and her lawyer many times to the Ru’nan county court, Zhumadian intermediate people’s court ruling has failed to reflect the problem, the error is corrected, the superior court final judgment "law". Chinese voice reports, Zhumadian City Intermediate People’s court today responded that morning, has decided to send an investigation team stationed in the Ru’nan county court, relevant issues mentioned investigation report. Case of the parties in the hands of Zhu Mingyi Zhumadian City Intermediate People’s court in favor of the verdict has been nearly 4 years, her rights have not been maintained, before the Ru’nan County Court ruled that the error has not been corrected. In order to file a complaint, the revocation of Ru’nan County error ruling, a few years, she repeatedly run between two courts, to the Ru’nan court, the Ru’nan court said you need to go to the Zhumadian intermediate people’s court. To the Zhumadian intermediate people’s court, Zhumadian intermediate people’s court said you need to go to Ru’nan. So, around. I’ve been here once. I really feel very desperate. "Zhu Mingyi’s 4 years in favor of the entry into force of the judgment, ruled illegal court did not take the initiative to correct the lower court decision has led to Zhumadian City, is the" law ". Zhu Mingyi’s lawyer Wang Si said: "Ru’nan County Court illegal execution, the subject matter has been punished, so the intermediate court cannot perform. In the implementation, the intermediate court also found this problem, but no one to correct the implementation of the Ru’nan County court." In the case of the subject matter, Zhu Mingyi’s arrears of 30% stake in a company owned by Liu Manliang. Before the two sides in Queshan County Industrial and Commercial Bureau do equity pledge registration. This means that if Liu Manliang can not repay the debt, he has to do the pledge of shares, Zhu Mingyi’s debt can be guaranteed. However, the Ru’nan county court but when implementing another case, to inform and determine the form, inform the Queshan County Industrial and Commercial Bureau, equity pledge registration invalid. Li Dongfang, director of the Institute of economic law, China University of Political Science and Law professor pointed out: "the administrative behavior of the industrial and commercial sector, a notice of the court, a ruling on the invalid, it is absurd. The court does not have this power. If you want to determine the administrative act is invalid, it is necessary to determine the entity. The court carried out the wrong, how the compensation on how to compensate ah. Fault is the fault of the court, it does not have this power, but the implementation of this authority, has led to such a result." This morning, Zhumadian City Intermediate People’s court spokesman Liu Yaoqiang told reporters, Chinese Voice reported after the broadcast, the court has set up an investigation team stationed in Ru’nan county court, "our Party attaches great importance to the court, President Zhang Shejun chaired yesterday afternoon held a by the supervision department, the executive board, the court and other relevant departments to participate in the two the meeting decided to form the investigation team stationed in.相关的主题文章: